Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:50
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why are people becoming increasingly hostile to pro-lifers? I am pro-life.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
How can people balance religious beliefs with seeking professional mental health care?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Can I use Amazon Alexa Claude AI on my Echo device?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
You Can Own This Ultra-Rare Italian Viper - Motor1.com
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Two More Persona 4 Actors Have Said They're Not Returning for an Unannounced Persona 4 Remake - IGN
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
We finally may be able to rid the world of mosquitoes. But should we? - The Washington Post